<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1266 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) in deleting the additions on account of contributions to the Superannuation Fund and Gratuity Fund, subject to the approval of the Deed of Variation by the Commissioner of Income-tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for necessary approvals and specific verification by the Assessing Officer, ultimately dismissing the appeal of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:10:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1266 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) in deleting the additions on account of contributions to the Superannuation Fund and Gratuity Fund, subject to the approval of the Deed of Variation by the Commissioner of Income-tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for necessary approvals and specific verification by the Assessing Officer, ultimately dismissing the appeal of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>