<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 924 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW  TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351045</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, declaring the petition under section 9 as not maintainable due to the invalid notice issued by an unauthorized advocate on behalf of the operational creditor. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, releasing them from legal constraints, allowing independent operation through their Board of Directors. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to determine the Interim Resolution Professional&#039;s fee, to be paid by the appellant for the period worked. Appeals were disposed of with no costs, and the Company Petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 924 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW  TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351045</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, declaring the petition under section 9 as not maintainable due to the invalid notice issued by an unauthorized advocate on behalf of the operational creditor. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, releasing them from legal constraints, allowing independent operation through their Board of Directors. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to determine the Interim Resolution Professional&#039;s fee, to be paid by the appellant for the period worked. Appeals were disposed of with no costs, and the Company Petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>