<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 708 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196055</link>
    <description>In a passing off and copyright infringement dispute, the SC held that interim injunctive relief should not be vacated merely because of delay and laches where the record prima facie showed prior user, prior copyright in the packaging and mark, and dishonest adoption by the defendant. Delay alone was not decisive in the face of evidence suggesting an attempt to pass off goods as those of the plaintiff. The appellate court erred in treating delay as determinative without dislodging the prima facie findings supporting restraint. The vacatur of the injunction was therefore unsustainable, and the interim injunction was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 708 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196055</link>
      <description>In a passing off and copyright infringement dispute, the SC held that interim injunctive relief should not be vacated merely because of delay and laches where the record prima facie showed prior user, prior copyright in the packaging and mark, and dishonest adoption by the defendant. Delay alone was not decisive in the face of evidence suggesting an attempt to pass off goods as those of the plaintiff. The appellate court erred in treating delay as determinative without dislodging the prima facie findings supporting restraint. The vacatur of the injunction was therefore unsustainable, and the interim injunction was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>