<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 888 - COMPANY LAW BOARD,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196051</link>
    <description>The Board concluded that the company operated as a quasi-partnership, affirming the petitioners&#039; legitimate expectation of board representation. The respondents were directed to either appoint a petitioner representative as a working director or purchase the petitioners&#039; shares at a fair value determined by an independent valuer within 15 days. The petition was disposed of with the option for parties to seek an independent valuer if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 11:09:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 888 - COMPANY LAW BOARD,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196051</link>
      <description>The Board concluded that the company operated as a quasi-partnership, affirming the petitioners&#039; legitimate expectation of board representation. The respondents were directed to either appoint a petitioner representative as a working director or purchase the petitioners&#039; shares at a fair value determined by an independent valuer within 15 days. The petition was disposed of with the option for parties to seek an independent valuer if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>