https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196047 A pre-emptor who had secured a decree from the first court retained the benefit of pre-emption during the vendee's appeal, and a later notification could not defeat that vested right merely because it was issued at the appellate stage. The court also found the notification excluding pre-emption rights in favour of the purchasers to be mala fide, relying on the adverse inquiry material, suppression of facts, absence of a binding undertaking against misuse, and the unexplained shift in departmental position. The notification was therefore invalid and struck down. en-us Mon, 06 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 10:41:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196047 A pre-emptor who had secured a decree from the first court retained the benefit of pre-emption during the vendee's appeal, and a later notification could not defeat that vested right merely because it was issued at the appellate stage. The court also found the notification excluding pre-emption rights in favour of the purchasers to be mala fide, relying on the adverse inquiry material, suppression of facts, absence of a binding undertaking against misuse, and the unexplained shift in departmental position. The notification was therefore invalid and struck down. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196047