<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1225 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196045</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellants were entitled to claim a refund of the unutilised credit in their CENVAT account. The Tribunal found that the cases cited by the Revenue were not applicable, as they dealt with different scenarios. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 10:24:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1225 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196045</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellants were entitled to claim a refund of the unutilised credit in their CENVAT account. The Tribunal found that the cases cited by the Revenue were not applicable, as they dealt with different scenarios. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>