https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196038 Revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC was confined to jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or material illegality, so a contention expressly abandoned before the appellate court could not be revived in revision. Under the Bombay Rent Act, deposit of interim rent under Section 11(3) did not amount to payment of standard rent, and it did not satisfy Section 12(1), Section 12(3)(b), or the Explanation to Section 12 unless the tenant had made the required timely application and remained ready and willing to pay standard rent. Relief against forfeiture was also unavailable in a tenancy determined otherwise than by forfeiture, leaving no independent equitable discretion to refuse possession. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:07:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196038 Revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC was confined to jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or material illegality, so a contention expressly abandoned before the appellate court could not be revived in revision. Under the Bombay Rent Act, deposit of interim rent under Section 11(3) did not amount to payment of standard rent, and it did not satisfy Section 12(1), Section 12(3)(b), or the Explanation to Section 12 unless the tenant had made the required timely application and remained ready and willing to pay standard rent. Relief against forfeiture was also unavailable in a tenancy determined otherwise than by forfeiture, leaving no independent equitable discretion to refuse possession. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196038