https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196036 Possession with the landlord's permission and payment of rent can justify a presumption of tenancy even where no valid operative lease came into existence. On those facts, the tenancy was treated as a month-to-month tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act because there was no valid contract or legal basis for a different duration. As a monthly tenancy, it required fifteen days' notice to quit expiring with the end of a month of tenancy; in the absence of such notice, eviction could not be sustained and the tenant's possession was protected. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:53:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196036 Possession with the landlord's permission and payment of rent can justify a presumption of tenancy even where no valid operative lease came into existence. On those facts, the tenancy was treated as a month-to-month tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act because there was no valid contract or legal basis for a different duration. As a monthly tenancy, it required fifteen days' notice to quit expiring with the end of a month of tenancy; in the absence of such notice, eviction could not be sustained and the tenant's possession was protected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196036