https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196034 The court held that MTNL's decision to disqualify the petitioner's bid for not superscribing EMD details on the outer envelope was irrational and arbitrary. The court found that the condition was not essential and should have been waived, as it did not materially affect the bid terms. The court set aside MTNL's action, directing them to consider the petitioner's bid if other conditions were met. The decision emphasized the need for administrative actions to be rational and fair, allowing for judicial review in cases of arbitrariness or lack of fairness. en-us Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:24:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196034 The court held that MTNL's decision to disqualify the petitioner's bid for not superscribing EMD details on the outer envelope was irrational and arbitrary. The court found that the condition was not essential and should have been waived, as it did not materially affect the bid terms. The court set aside MTNL's action, directing them to consider the petitioner's bid if other conditions were met. The decision emphasized the need for administrative actions to be rational and fair, allowing for judicial review in cases of arbitrariness or lack of fairness. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196034