<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 911 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing opportunities for cross-examination and upholding principles of natural justice in assessment proceedings. The judgment highlighted the necessity of conclusive proof and adherence to procedural fairness to ensure the validity and integrity of the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 911 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing opportunities for cross-examination and upholding principles of natural justice in assessment proceedings. The judgment highlighted the necessity of conclusive proof and adherence to procedural fairness to ensure the validity and integrity of the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>