<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 909 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351030</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the proceedings initiated under section 153C due to the lack of proper jurisdiction as the satisfaction note was not recorded by the AO in his capacity as the AO of the searched person. Consequently, the additions made on account of unexplained cash salary were also deemed invalid. The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:58:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 909 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351030</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the proceedings initiated under section 153C due to the lack of proper jurisdiction as the satisfaction note was not recorded by the AO in his capacity as the AO of the searched person. Consequently, the additions made on account of unexplained cash salary were also deemed invalid. The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>