<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 904 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351025</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CITA], dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The ITAT found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to support the genuineness of the transactions, and the AO&#039;s conclusions were deemed unfounded. The ITAT concluded that the assessee was entitled to the exemption for long-term capital gains, and the addition made by the AO was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 904 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351025</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CITA], dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The ITAT found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to support the genuineness of the transactions, and the AO&#039;s conclusions were deemed unfounded. The ITAT concluded that the assessee was entitled to the exemption for long-term capital gains, and the addition made by the AO was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>