<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 899 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351020</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata dismissed all 5 appeals filed by the revenue against the Ld. CIT(A) order for AYs 2007-08 to 2011-12. The revenue failed to explain the grounds of appeal, showing a lack of application of mind. The Tribunal noted the acceptance of the companies&#039; existence and creditworthiness in the remand report but refrained from commenting on the merits. As the revenue made no effort to challenge the Ld. CIT(A) decision or provide revised grounds, the appeals were dismissed on 02.08.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 899 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351020</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata dismissed all 5 appeals filed by the revenue against the Ld. CIT(A) order for AYs 2007-08 to 2011-12. The revenue failed to explain the grounds of appeal, showing a lack of application of mind. The Tribunal noted the acceptance of the companies&#039; existence and creditworthiness in the remand report but refrained from commenting on the merits. As the revenue made no effort to challenge the Ld. CIT(A) decision or provide revised grounds, the appeals were dismissed on 02.08.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>