<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 894 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow the refund claim. It was determined that the appellant met procedural requirements and provided sufficient evidence of export. The Tribunal emphasized that substantial benefits should not be denied due to procedural lapses and upheld the right to refund unutilized credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 894 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow the refund claim. It was determined that the appellant met procedural requirements and provided sufficient evidence of export. The Tribunal emphasized that substantial benefits should not be denied due to procedural lapses and upheld the right to refund unutilized credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>