https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196016 Expiry of a lease over nazul land left the occupants without subsisting right, title, or authority; mere continued possession or payment could not create holding over without the lessor's assent, so the occupation and any derivative transfer rights were unauthorised. A building plan obtained without full disclosure of land title could not be retained, because fraud and suppression vitiate administrative action and the urban planning statute did not permit regularisation of illegal construction through compounding charges. The recall of the sanctioned map was therefore upheld, and the construction remained incapable of regularisation on the basis of subsequent payment or acquiescence. en-us Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:54:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196016 Expiry of a lease over nazul land left the occupants without subsisting right, title, or authority; mere continued possession or payment could not create holding over without the lessor's assent, so the occupation and any derivative transfer rights were unauthorised. A building plan obtained without full disclosure of land title could not be retained, because fraud and suppression vitiate administrative action and the urban planning statute did not permit regularisation of illegal construction through compounding charges. The recall of the sanctioned map was therefore upheld, and the construction remained incapable of regularisation on the basis of subsequent payment or acquiescence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196016