https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196022 A lease that expires by efflux of time and can be renewed only in the manner required by the lease deed and governing statutory provisions is not renewed merely because rent is accepted after expiry. Such acceptance does not amount to assent to holding over, and occupation after expiry becomes unauthorised where the property is public premises. A person claiming through the original lessee cannot acquire a better right by compromise decree, sale deed, or substitution under Order 22 Rule 10 if the transferor had no subsisting title or transferable interest. The Court therefore treated both the lessee's claim and the transferee's claim as unenforceable against the lessor. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:54:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196022 A lease that expires by efflux of time and can be renewed only in the manner required by the lease deed and governing statutory provisions is not renewed merely because rent is accepted after expiry. Such acceptance does not amount to assent to holding over, and occupation after expiry becomes unauthorised where the property is public premises. A person claiming through the original lessee cannot acquire a better right by compromise decree, sale deed, or substitution under Order 22 Rule 10 if the transferor had no subsisting title or transferable interest. The Court therefore treated both the lessee's claim and the transferee's claim as unenforceable against the lessor. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196022