<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1483 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196008</link>
    <description>Conditional exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. was available for goods supplied to the UN and other international organisations for their projects, but the claimant had to establish actual supply for the UNICEF project through supporting evidence. The certificates produced covered the cleared motor vehicles, yet they were issued in favour of M/s. Eicher Motors Ltd. and referred to the UNICEF purchase order placed on that concern. Further documentary proof was therefore required to show that the goods were in fact supplied for the UNICEF project either by the appellant or through M/s. Eicher Motors Ltd. The exemption claim was accepted in principle, subject to furnishing such proof before the Original Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1483 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196008</link>
      <description>Conditional exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. was available for goods supplied to the UN and other international organisations for their projects, but the claimant had to establish actual supply for the UNICEF project through supporting evidence. The certificates produced covered the cleared motor vehicles, yet they were issued in favour of M/s. Eicher Motors Ltd. and referred to the UNICEF purchase order placed on that concern. Further documentary proof was therefore required to show that the goods were in fact supplied for the UNICEF project either by the appellant or through M/s. Eicher Motors Ltd. The exemption claim was accepted in principle, subject to furnishing such proof before the Original Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>