<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1574 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW  TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196024</link>
    <description>The application to initiate insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was rejected by the tribunal due to the applicant&#039;s failure to provide sufficient and genuine documentation to support the claims and confirm the respondent&#039;s status as a corporate person. The tribunal emphasized the importance of professionals exercising greater care and diligence in certifying documents and cautioned against fraudulent initiation of proceedings under the IBC. The rejection was made without costs, underlining the significance of complying with procedural requirements and the responsibilities of professionals in the insolvency process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1574 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW  TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196024</link>
      <description>The application to initiate insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was rejected by the tribunal due to the applicant&#039;s failure to provide sufficient and genuine documentation to support the claims and confirm the respondent&#039;s status as a corporate person. The tribunal emphasized the importance of professionals exercising greater care and diligence in certifying documents and cautioned against fraudulent initiation of proceedings under the IBC. The rejection was made without costs, underlining the significance of complying with procedural requirements and the responsibilities of professionals in the insolvency process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>