<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 688 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195996</link>
    <description>A confirmed statutory auction sale was not set aside because the objections were raised belatedly, no satisfactory explanation for the delay was shown, and no prejudice from the alleged procedural defects was demonstrated. The sale proclamation had been issued, the reserve price and EMD clerical error was corrected by corrigendum, and the objectors did not pursue the prescribed remedy by depositing the amount required to challenge the sale. After deposit of the bid amount and confirmation of sale in favour of the bank, the mortgagors&#039; right of redemption did not survive, and a later willingness to pay could not undo the completed sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:08:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 688 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195996</link>
      <description>A confirmed statutory auction sale was not set aside because the objections were raised belatedly, no satisfactory explanation for the delay was shown, and no prejudice from the alleged procedural defects was demonstrated. The sale proclamation had been issued, the reserve price and EMD clerical error was corrected by corrigendum, and the objectors did not pursue the prescribed remedy by depositing the amount required to challenge the sale. After deposit of the bid amount and confirmation of sale in favour of the bank, the mortgagors&#039; right of redemption did not survive, and a later willingness to pay could not undo the completed sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>