<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1071 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195990</link>
    <description>A post-decree compromise affects execution only if it amounts to an adjustment or satisfaction of the decree and is recorded by the executing court under Order 21 Rule 2; an unrecorded adjustment cannot be relied on to resist execution under Order 21 Rule 3. Where the compromise merely regulated surrender of part of the premises and granted time for the balance, while preserving the landlord&#039;s right to execute on default, it did not extinguish the eviction decree. The fresh lease deed and the earlier execution petition being dismissed as not pressed did not alter the decree&#039;s executability, and the objection to execution failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1071 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195990</link>
      <description>A post-decree compromise affects execution only if it amounts to an adjustment or satisfaction of the decree and is recorded by the executing court under Order 21 Rule 2; an unrecorded adjustment cannot be relied on to resist execution under Order 21 Rule 3. Where the compromise merely regulated surrender of part of the premises and granted time for the balance, while preserving the landlord&#039;s right to execute on default, it did not extinguish the eviction decree. The fresh lease deed and the earlier execution petition being dismissed as not pressed did not alter the decree&#039;s executability, and the objection to execution failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>