<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 861 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350982</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, estimating an additional income of Rs. 38,08,709/- to be taxed, reflecting 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases made by the assessee from the grey market. This adjustment aligns the total income with the presumptive tax scheme for small contractors under Section 44AD.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 861 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350982</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, estimating an additional income of Rs. 38,08,709/- to be taxed, reflecting 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases made by the assessee from the grey market. This adjustment aligns the total income with the presumptive tax scheme for small contractors under Section 44AD.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>