<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 857 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350978</link>
    <description>The tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was warranted. The explanation provided for the expenses was deemed bona fide, and the incurred expenses were considered genuine business expenses arising from extraordinary circumstances. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was deleted, as confirmed by the CIT(A), and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:38:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 857 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350978</link>
      <description>The tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was warranted. The explanation provided for the expenses was deemed bona fide, and the incurred expenses were considered genuine business expenses arising from extraordinary circumstances. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was deleted, as confirmed by the CIT(A), and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>