<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 853 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify and potentially allow the deduction for the gratuity fund contribution if the Commissioner of Income Tax approved the changes in the Deed of Gratuity Fund. Regarding the restructuring expenses, the Tribunal instructed the AO to permit the deduction in accordance with Section 35DD, based on the precedent set in the assessee&#039;s previous case. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 853 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify and potentially allow the deduction for the gratuity fund contribution if the Commissioner of Income Tax approved the changes in the Deed of Gratuity Fund. Regarding the restructuring expenses, the Tribunal instructed the AO to permit the deduction in accordance with Section 35DD, based on the precedent set in the assessee&#039;s previous case. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>