<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 844 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350965</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the impugned Orders-in-Appeal. No evidence of smuggling was found against the Dal Mill owners or other respondents. Penalties and fines were deemed unsustainable due to lack of seizure and proof of involvement in smuggling. The respondents were entitled to consequential benefits, including the return of pre-deposits with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 844 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350965</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the impugned Orders-in-Appeal. No evidence of smuggling was found against the Dal Mill owners or other respondents. Penalties and fines were deemed unsustainable due to lack of seizure and proof of involvement in smuggling. The respondents were entitled to consequential benefits, including the return of pre-deposits with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>