<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 839 - ATFEMA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revision petition challenging the penalty imposed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as it found the petition not maintainable. The respondent had already paid the penalty, and no further action was taken against them. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements and conducting inquiries as prescribed by the Act for proper penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:48:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 839 - ATFEMA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revision petition challenging the penalty imposed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as it found the petition not maintainable. The respondent had already paid the penalty, and no further action was taken against them. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements and conducting inquiries as prescribed by the Act for proper penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>