<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 834 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original order of the Commissioner(Appeals) allowing the rebate claim with interest payment and invalidated the corrigendum that deleted the interest relief, emphasizing the legal obligation to pay interest on delayed refunds as per the relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 834 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original order of the Commissioner(Appeals) allowing the rebate claim with interest payment and invalidated the corrigendum that deleted the interest relief, emphasizing the legal obligation to pay interest on delayed refunds as per the relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>