<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 833 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals) decision, allowing refund on input service invoices addressed to premises other than the registered premises. The Tribunal emphasized that there is no statutory requirement for registration to claim CENVAT credit on input services, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:47:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 833 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals) decision, allowing refund on input service invoices addressed to premises other than the registered premises. The Tribunal emphasized that there is no statutory requirement for registration to claim CENVAT credit on input services, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>