https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350948 The appellant filed appeals against the Commissioner's order disallowing CENVAT Credit for services rendered, upholding recovery demands, interest, and penalties. The appellant argued the order did not consider relevant judicial precedents. The dispute centered on whether the services were utilized in manufacturing final products. The Judicial Member allowed the appeals, finding that distributing credit through ISD invoices based on service receipt location was permissible. The Member considered the services as input services, contrary to the findings of the impugned order. The order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed on 13/11/2017. en-us Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350948 The appellant filed appeals against the Commissioner's order disallowing CENVAT Credit for services rendered, upholding recovery demands, interest, and penalties. The appellant argued the order did not consider relevant judicial precedents. The dispute centered on whether the services were utilized in manufacturing final products. The Judicial Member allowed the appeals, finding that distributing credit through ISD invoices based on service receipt location was permissible. The Member considered the services as input services, contrary to the findings of the impugned order. The order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed on 13/11/2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350948