<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 817 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350938</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the rejection of the refund of interest paid for the reversal of CENVAT credit. The tribunal determined that the appellant, who had not utilized the CENVAT credit during the relevant period and had a sufficient balance, was not liable to pay interest. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the refund of the interest paid, concluding in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:02:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 817 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350938</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the rejection of the refund of interest paid for the reversal of CENVAT credit. The tribunal determined that the appellant, who had not utilized the CENVAT credit during the relevant period and had a sufficient balance, was not liable to pay interest. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the refund of the interest paid, concluding in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>