<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1491 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the violation of Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 but found the redemption fine and penalty imposed excessive. In the interest of substantial justice, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 50,000 and the penalty amount to Rs. 10,000. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, modifying the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:47:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1491 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the violation of Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 but found the redemption fine and penalty imposed excessive. In the interest of substantial justice, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 50,000 and the penalty amount to Rs. 10,000. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, modifying the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>