https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195982 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license by the Customs authorities. The revocation was deemed as double jeopardy, violating the appellant's rights under Article 20 of the Constitution of India. The Tribunal held that since the license was already restored following a previous order, there was no legal basis for the subsequent revocation. The decision emphasized the importance of upholding legal principles and protecting individuals from unjust treatment by authorities, ensuring fair administrative actions in line with constitutional rights. en-us Mon, 23 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:47:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195982 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license by the Customs authorities. The revocation was deemed as double jeopardy, violating the appellant's rights under Article 20 of the Constitution of India. The Tribunal held that since the license was already restored following a previous order, there was no legal basis for the subsequent revocation. The decision emphasized the importance of upholding legal principles and protecting individuals from unjust treatment by authorities, ensuring fair administrative actions in line with constitutional rights. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 23 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195982