<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1310 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195989</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decision disallowing the cenvat credit claim and imposing the penalty. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the validity of invoices and duty payment before the show cause notice was rejected. The tribunal found the invoices invalid for claiming cenvat credit and justified the penalty imposition as the duty payment was not voluntary. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the department&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:47:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1310 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195989</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decision disallowing the cenvat credit claim and imposing the penalty. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the validity of invoices and duty payment before the show cause notice was rejected. The tribunal found the invoices invalid for claiming cenvat credit and justified the penalty imposition as the duty payment was not voluntary. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the department&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>