https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350931 The court denied the appellant's request for a final hearing before the Diwali vacation but acknowledged the need for expediting the case. The matter was scheduled for consideration on merits, emphasizing the importance of expediting the case based on the Single Judge's reasoning. The court ordered a stay on coercive steps by the respondents until the next hearing, subject to the appellant depositing Rs. 5 crores in two installments. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 2.5 crores within 10 days and the remaining amount within three weeks. The court noted the respondent's request for the appellant to deposit 50% of the amount before the next hearing for examination. en-us Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:52:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350931 The court denied the appellant's request for a final hearing before the Diwali vacation but acknowledged the need for expediting the case. The matter was scheduled for consideration on merits, emphasizing the importance of expediting the case based on the Single Judge's reasoning. The court ordered a stay on coercive steps by the respondents until the next hearing, subject to the appellant depositing Rs. 5 crores in two installments. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 2.5 crores within 10 days and the remaining amount within three weeks. The court noted the respondent's request for the appellant to deposit 50% of the amount before the next hearing for examination. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350931