<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 797 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195972</link>
    <description>The appeal against a judgment and decree in a Civil Suit for loan recovery was dismissed. The guarantor had executed a continuing guarantee, including an equitable mortgage, with the Bank. The Court upheld the decree, finding the suit within the 12-year limitation period. The appellant&#039;s request for consideration under a one-time settlement scheme was granted, with the Bank directed to independently assess the case if approached within the specified timeframe. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:55:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 797 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195972</link>
      <description>The appeal against a judgment and decree in a Civil Suit for loan recovery was dismissed. The guarantor had executed a continuing guarantee, including an equitable mortgage, with the Bank. The Court upheld the decree, finding the suit within the 12-year limitation period. The appellant&#039;s request for consideration under a one-time settlement scheme was granted, with the Bank directed to independently assess the case if approached within the specified timeframe. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>