https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195971 Statutory terms and conditions of electricity supply were treated as enforceable measures to deter delayed payment and compensate the supplier for non-payment. An interim stay in earlier writ proceedings did not extinguish the consumer's underlying liability or bar recovery once the substantive challenge to the tariff failed. Applying restitution, the Court held that the parties should be restored, so far as possible, to the position they would have occupied without interim protection. The earlier tariff decisions relied on by the consumer were distinguished on their different contractual and procedural settings. The demand for additional charges and surcharge for delayed payment was therefore upheld. en-us Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 May 2023 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195971 Statutory terms and conditions of electricity supply were treated as enforceable measures to deter delayed payment and compensate the supplier for non-payment. An interim stay in earlier writ proceedings did not extinguish the consumer's underlying liability or bar recovery once the substantive challenge to the tariff failed. Applying restitution, the Court held that the parties should be restored, so far as possible, to the position they would have occupied without interim protection. The earlier tariff decisions relied on by the consumer were distinguished on their different contractual and procedural settings. The demand for additional charges and surcharge for delayed payment was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195971