<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (11) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195966</link>
    <description>The amended definitions of &quot;estate&quot; and &quot;intermediary&quot; under the Orissa Estates Abolition Act were construed broadly to include holders of interests in land between the raiyat and the State, including zamindars and similar holders. On the facts, the appellants and their predecessors had long ceased to be sovereign rulers and were subject to the sovereignty and administration of the Ruler of Gangpur; the annual takoli was treated as land revenue, not tribute. As sovereignty had passed, the appellants were intermediaries within the Act and their lands fell within the statutory description of estate, making the holdings liable to acquisition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:17:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (11) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195966</link>
      <description>The amended definitions of &quot;estate&quot; and &quot;intermediary&quot; under the Orissa Estates Abolition Act were construed broadly to include holders of interests in land between the raiyat and the State, including zamindars and similar holders. On the facts, the appellants and their predecessors had long ceased to be sovereign rulers and were subject to the sovereignty and administration of the Ruler of Gangpur; the annual takoli was treated as land revenue, not tribute. As sovereignty had passed, the appellants were intermediaries within the Act and their lands fell within the statutory description of estate, making the holdings liable to acquisition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>