https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195964 The Supreme Court refrained from determining possession and title issues in a case involving a petition under Article 226 for hereditary rights over a Dargah. The Court held that the respondent's possession rights were held in abeyance by a Firman of the Nizam pending civil court adjudication. It emphasized that the Constitution did not alter this position and rejected the High Court's decision granting possession to the respondent. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's decision and dismissing the respondent's petition for a writ, with no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:41:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195964 The Supreme Court refrained from determining possession and title issues in a case involving a petition under Article 226 for hereditary rights over a Dargah. The Court held that the respondent's possession rights were held in abeyance by a Firman of the Nizam pending civil court adjudication. It emphasized that the Constitution did not alter this position and rejected the High Court's decision granting possession to the respondent. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's decision and dismissing the respondent's petition for a writ, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195964