<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 792 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350913</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals of three assessees challenging penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with assessment proceedings. The ITAT held that the detention of a key person and engagement in court proceedings constituted a reasonable cause for non-compliance, as per section 273B of the Act. Consequently, the penalties were deleted for all assessment years in question, and the appeals were allowed on 31st August 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:56:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 792 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350913</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals of three assessees challenging penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with assessment proceedings. The ITAT held that the detention of a key person and engagement in court proceedings constituted a reasonable cause for non-compliance, as per section 273B of the Act. Consequently, the penalties were deleted for all assessment years in question, and the appeals were allowed on 31st August 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>