<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 790 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350911</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition without costs, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the appropriate forum within the specified period. An interim injunction was granted, restraining recovery proceedings, pending confirmation of service of the Order-in-Original. The court allowed a 30-day abeyance of the demand for the petitioner to appeal against the Order-in-Original received on 18.9.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:55:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 790 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350911</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition without costs, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the appropriate forum within the specified period. An interim injunction was granted, restraining recovery proceedings, pending confirmation of service of the Order-in-Original. The court allowed a 30-day abeyance of the demand for the petitioner to appeal against the Order-in-Original received on 18.9.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>