<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 789 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350910</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order and allowed all appeals in a case involving failure to produce valid import documents, procedural lapses in unloading goods, and the confiscation of goods with penalty imposition. Despite procedural violations, the absence of duty liability and reasons provided by the importer rendered the confiscation and penalties unjustified under Section 111(h) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 789 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350910</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order and allowed all appeals in a case involving failure to produce valid import documents, procedural lapses in unloading goods, and the confiscation of goods with penalty imposition. Despite procedural violations, the absence of duty liability and reasons provided by the importer rendered the confiscation and penalties unjustified under Section 111(h) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>