https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350909 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112(b)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the main party had paid the duty, interest, and penalty. Relying on the decision in Gautam Pukhraj Bafna case, the Tribunal found that the penalty against the co-appellant was not sustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential relief. The cross objection was also disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2017 13:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350909 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112(b)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the main party had paid the duty, interest, and penalty. Relying on the decision in Gautam Pukhraj Bafna case, the Tribunal found that the penalty against the co-appellant was not sustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential relief. The cross objection was also disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350909