<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 787 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified goods imported by M/s. LG Life Sciences India Pvt. Ltd. under CTH 9018 90 33, emphasizing accurate classification based on the item&#039;s nature and use. It set aside an Order-in-Appeal from 16-6-2014 as inconsequential due to a subsequent order. The Tribunal upheld the classification under CTH 9018 90 33 in another Order-in-Appeal from 1161/2015, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment stressed the importance of proper classification for customs compliance, highlighting the necessity of analyzing goods&#039; properties and intended use for correct classification under the Customs Tariff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:54:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 787 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified goods imported by M/s. LG Life Sciences India Pvt. Ltd. under CTH 9018 90 33, emphasizing accurate classification based on the item&#039;s nature and use. It set aside an Order-in-Appeal from 16-6-2014 as inconsequential due to a subsequent order. The Tribunal upheld the classification under CTH 9018 90 33 in another Order-in-Appeal from 1161/2015, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment stressed the importance of proper classification for customs compliance, highlighting the necessity of analyzing goods&#039; properties and intended use for correct classification under the Customs Tariff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>