<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 784 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350905</link>
    <description>An order permitting impleadment of a workmen&#039;s association in proceedings under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was challenged before the NCLAT on the ground that it should not be interfered with after admission of the application. The tribunal disposed of the appeal with observations and left the impugned order undisturbed, so the impleadment order continued to stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 784 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350905</link>
      <description>An order permitting impleadment of a workmen&#039;s association in proceedings under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was challenged before the NCLAT on the ground that it should not be interfered with after admission of the application. The tribunal disposed of the appeal with observations and left the impugned order undisturbed, so the impleadment order continued to stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>