<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 783 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350904</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allows the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to pay outstanding electricity charges accrued during the moratorium period to the respondent, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited. Upon payment, the respondent must restore the electrical connection within 48 hours. The judgment specifies that the Corporate Debtor is not liable for pre-moratorium dues, which can be addressed in the Resolution Plan. The IRP is directed to ensure timely payment of monthly electricity charges to avoid service disruptions. Failure to comply may result in appropriate action by the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:54:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 783 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350904</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allows the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to pay outstanding electricity charges accrued during the moratorium period to the respondent, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited. Upon payment, the respondent must restore the electrical connection within 48 hours. The judgment specifies that the Corporate Debtor is not liable for pre-moratorium dues, which can be addressed in the Resolution Plan. The IRP is directed to ensure timely payment of monthly electricity charges to avoid service disruptions. Failure to comply may result in appropriate action by the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>