https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350899 In an appeal against acquittal under the NDPS Act, the Supreme Court held that interference is justified only when the trial court's view is not reasonably possible. The prosecution relied mainly on identification of the fleeing driver and recovery of the appellant's passbook from the vehicle, but the witnesses did not know the appellant earlier, gave inconsistent descriptions, no test identification parade was held, and the contemporaneous material was unreliable. The passbook recovery alone did not prove that the appellant was the driver or in conscious possession of the contraband. The Court set aside the conviction and restored the acquittal. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:51:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350899 In an appeal against acquittal under the NDPS Act, the Supreme Court held that interference is justified only when the trial court's view is not reasonably possible. The prosecution relied mainly on identification of the fleeing driver and recovery of the appellant's passbook from the vehicle, but the witnesses did not know the appellant earlier, gave inconsistent descriptions, no test identification parade was held, and the contemporaneous material was unreliable. The passbook recovery alone did not prove that the appellant was the driver or in conscious possession of the contraband. The Court set aside the conviction and restored the acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350899