https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350888 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the demand for reversal of cenvat credit on inputs used in the destroyed work in progress goods was not sustainable under Rule 3(5B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The judgment emphasized the correct interpretation of the rules and legal principles, ultimately granting relief to the appellant and setting aside the impugned order. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350888 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the demand for reversal of cenvat credit on inputs used in the destroyed work in progress goods was not sustainable under Rule 3(5B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The judgment emphasized the correct interpretation of the rules and legal principles, ultimately granting relief to the appellant and setting aside the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350888