<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 765 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order, dismissing the Appeals filed by the Appellants. The judgment highlighted the intentional manipulation of records and failure to meet refund eligibility conditions, leading to the rejection of the Appellant&#039;s defenses. The ruling emphasized the inadmissibility of credit on traded goods and concluded that the Appellants&#039; actions did not align with their claims of limitation, revenue neutrality, and bona fide belief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 765 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order, dismissing the Appeals filed by the Appellants. The judgment highlighted the intentional manipulation of records and failure to meet refund eligibility conditions, leading to the rejection of the Appellant&#039;s defenses. The ruling emphasized the inadmissibility of credit on traded goods and concluded that the Appellants&#039; actions did not align with their claims of limitation, revenue neutrality, and bona fide belief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>