<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 758 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for further examination of evidence on the availing of CENVAT credit on capital goods leading to waste and scrap generation. The decision stressed verifying factual aspects before imposing duty under Rule 3(5A) of CCR, 2004, ensuring fair duty liability determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 758 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for further examination of evidence on the availing of CENVAT credit on capital goods leading to waste and scrap generation. The decision stressed verifying factual aspects before imposing duty under Rule 3(5A) of CCR, 2004, ensuring fair duty liability determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>