https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350876 The Tribunal upheld duty demands on alleged clandestine removal of specific goods and suppression of finished goods due to insufficient evidence provided by the appellant to refute the allegations. However, the issue of irregular Cenvat credit availment was remanded for further review, requiring the appellant to provide relevant invoices for scrutiny to determine the eligibility of services claimed for credit. The decision emphasized the importance of proper documentation and compliance with registration requirements in availing tax credits. en-us Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350876 The Tribunal upheld duty demands on alleged clandestine removal of specific goods and suppression of finished goods due to insufficient evidence provided by the appellant to refute the allegations. However, the issue of irregular Cenvat credit availment was remanded for further review, requiring the appellant to provide relevant invoices for scrutiny to determine the eligibility of services claimed for credit. The decision emphasized the importance of proper documentation and compliance with registration requirements in availing tax credits. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350876