https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195949 The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 83,29,000/- as detention charges, ruling that the plaintiff did not mitigate its losses promptly. The suit was not barred by Section 155 of the Customs Act or by limitation. There was found to be privity of contract between the plaintiff and defendants No. 1 to 4. The plaintiff was permitted to dispose of the abandoned goods and keep the sale proceeds. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:33:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195949 The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 83,29,000/- as detention charges, ruling that the plaintiff did not mitigate its losses promptly. The suit was not barred by Section 155 of the Customs Act or by limitation. There was found to be privity of contract between the plaintiff and defendants No. 1 to 4. The plaintiff was permitted to dispose of the abandoned goods and keep the sale proceeds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195949